April 19th, 2007
I just read in Publishers Lunch that the Atlanta Journal-Constitution has eliminated its book editor position and may go to just wire copy. This is part of what I, as a journalist and as a book lover, see as a disturbing trend. The corporate bean counters will say that book sections are being eliminated or downsized at metropolitan dailies because of low readership and thus low ad revenue. And therein lies the problem for me. While I understand that papers have to make money in order to be able to be printed and they must increasingly compete with online content, they’ve become too corporate and focused on the bottom line for my taste. There’s something to be said for reporting the news and printing valuable stories just for the sake of public knowledge and education.
And while I’m sure the people who write for the wire services are talented individuals and work hard, the trend of many papers to go with more wire copy bucks what we all learned in journalism school — localize, localize, localize. Even if you have a national story, find the local angle and report it from that perspective. The same should be applied to book sections. Fine, run some wire copy, but don’t nix all of the local-angle book reporting. What is selling at local bookstores? What authors are coming to town for signings? What authors live and write within the paper’s circulation area? What books use the city as a setting? There are a lot of local-angle stories to be mined and made interesting so that readers don’t overlook the book section. It might take a bit of extra work on the part of the editorial staff, but personally I think it’s worth it.